Skip to main content

Thought Prompted by the Petrol Strike Debacle

"We are likely to find ourselves as intellectuals or political philosophers facing a situation in which our chief task is not to  imagine better worlds but rather to think how to prevent worse ones."
Tony Judt
In a week where cabinet ministers appear to be urging voters toward Buddhist-style self immolation, I thought that perhaps an automobile metaphor might be apposite. If you imagine society as a motor vehicle then the capitalist market is its engine and social democracy is its braking system. Hands up everyone who wants a car without brakes. OK, just Osborne and Clarkson then...

Comments

  1. Dick, your metaphor sums up what's wrong with social democracy as currently practised. It needs to be the steering wheel, in fact the whole control system of the car, making the engine take us where we want to go, not just slowing things down. Remember when we were told that automation and increasing productivity would lead to leisure so unlimited we would have trouble knowing what to do with ourselves? Whatever happened to that idea? Instead the way capitalism is taking us is making everyone work harder, except the super rich that is, and forcing us to retire later too. That's wrong. But I don't hear Ed Milliband, or Barak Obama, or Francois Hollande suggesting we should take the wheel and drive the huge productivity of capitalism to deliver what ordinary people want - such things as free education, good healthcare and the freedom to retire at a reasonable age as we wish. It doesn't help much trying to put the brakes on by marching with big signs saying "NO". There has got to be some route planning with a destination in view, to shift the world economy towards meeting the needs of ordinary people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is indeed the problem Tim, but the metaphor nevertheless has a lot of truth to it. The brakes on a car are not only for stopping it, they're essential to negotiating bends and safely interacting with other vehicles. The steering wheel of the car is ideology, and currently social democracy lacks a coherent ideology as you rightly observe: political correctness and multiculturalism were two failed attempts to provide one. That also implies though that social democracy can coexist with a variety of ideologies - neoliberalism isn't one of them because it almost explicitly demands the crushing of social democratic safeguards. My point is that social democracy, as the braking system, MUST be retained while we argue about who's going to drive and to where...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Add your comment here and press 'Publish' button

Popular posts from this blog

Social Democracy Uber Alles

The outcry over the revoking of Uber's London licence shows that the service it provides is popular, and it's unquestionably a significant, innovative use of new technology to improve transport. On the other hand the outcry from drivers about lack of benefits and job security show that the application of technology is being used (not uncommonly) both to increase exploitation of the labour force and to flout legal regulation designed to protect labour and customers. The outcry of Black Cab drivers against Uber ignores the fact that people flocked to Uber not merely for convenience (though that is considerable) but because Black Cabs had priced themselves out of the market with the last big price hike.

Put all this together and it's clear that all the parties need to get together and find a workable solution, which is highly unlikely to happen because of the vastly different political atmospheres between UK and USA, and a general lack of adult leadership on both sides. I ca…

The Touchy-Feely Inferno

This essay was originally the final, epilogue, chapter of an unpublished book I wrote in 2009. On re-reading it today I was struck that 9 years haven't changed much….

                      _________________ * ________________

“My holy of holies is the human body, health, intelligence, talent, inspiration, love, and absolute freedom – freedom from violence and falsehood, no matter how the last two manifest themselves.” [Anton Chekhov]


The incontinent expression of emotion has become a new orthodoxy, not only in popular culture but even in politics. We’re regularly treated nowadays to advertisements that exploit neuroscientific jargon where once they stuck to plain chemistry – they now seek to boost our serotonin levels rather than merely applying lipid microcapsules to our hair. The staple diet of celebrity magazines and soap operas is the ostentatious display of “emotional honesty” and “vulnerability”, people are always now “there for each other”. Hugging is as revealing of the t…

Big Money Rules

I've always been overly fond of irony, even though I also accept Rilke's sage advice in 'Letters To A Young Poet':

Irony: Don't let yourself be controlled by it, especially during uncreative moments. When you are fully creative, try to use it, as one more way to take hold of life. Used purely, it too is pure, and one needn't be ashamed of it; but if you feel yourself becoming too familiar with it, if you are afraid of this growing familiarity, then turn to great and serious objects, in front of which it becomes small and helpless.
(Viareggio, April 5th, 1903)

I'm neither young nor a poet, and I'd never actually become ashamed of irony until now. The irony that finally proved too much for me is this - that fate of democracy may now depend upon the best efforts of the US intelligence agencies. They may now be the only institutions capable of arresting (for their own far-from-progressive interests of course) the process described in Diane Ravitch's NYRB …